Legal Opinion

Farkas v. Farkas

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 30, 1998No. A98A1714PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

Sam Farkas, Sr. (“Sam”) brought this trover action against his cousin, Edwin Farkas, Jr. (“Edwin”), to recover possession of a grandfather clock. The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of Sam. Judgment was entered on the jury’s verdict, and Edwin appeals, enumerating as error only the trial court’s denial of his motion for a directed verdict. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment below.

The record shows that Sam testified he had long admired the clock, which belonged to the litigants’ aunt, Gertrude Farkas Meyer, and that shortly before she died she…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kornegay v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. McGrew v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Atlantic & Birmingham Railway Co. v. SpiresCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Wilkins v. HesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas Mote Trucking, Inc. v. PCL Civil Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. STATE OF GEORGIA v. JEFFREY v. MCKENZIECourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API