State v. Roberts
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
FOURNET, Chief Justice.
The defendants, Ira Coleman Roberts and Jack L. Holt, are appealing from their •conviction and sentence on an information charging them with conspiracy to commit theft, relying for the reversal thereof on two specifications of error allegedly committed by the trial judge in overruling their motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment, both of which are “grounded upon the proposition that the record discloses no probative evidence to support the convictions.” ,
The- Constitution of Louisiana grants to the Supreme Court authority to review criminal cases on questions…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- State v. NomeySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- State v. McLeanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- State v. McDonellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- State v. MartinezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Konen v. New Orleans Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- State v. CadeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- State v. Di VincentiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- State v. HeymannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
- State v. BrentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.