Legal Opinion

Howard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 25, 2004No. A03A1915PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

Hershel Daniel Howard was found guilty in a bench trial of driving under the influence of alcohol and driving with an open container of alcohol. His sole claim on appeal is that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress the evidence supporting the guilty verdicts because the police officer who stopped the vehicle he was driving did so without any reasonable basis under the Fourth Amendment. Because we find the officer had a reasonable basis to make an investigatory stop of the vehicle, the trial court correctly denied the motion to suppress.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  5. State v. MallardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Black v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Dawson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Esposito v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Bogan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API