Macquarrie v. Balch
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1DissentLewiton, J.
Despite the small amount involved in this case, I feel that the question of the proper construction of G.L. c. 118, § 10 is of sufficient importance to warrant expressing my views thereon. I am prompted to do so by reason of the fact that several other statutory programs for the relief of needy persons contain language substantially identical with that of § 10 (see, e.g., G.L. c. 115, § 5; G.L. c. 118A, § 6; G.L. c. 118D, § 13), and because I believe that the construction adopted by the majority here would destroy the protection with which the Legislature sought to shield public funds…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Porter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Trotter v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Lawrence v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Bolster v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Commonwealth v. S. S. Kresge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.