King v. Venters
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PALMORE, Chief Justice.
The appellants, David Lowell King and James Arthur King, were indicted in the Johnson Circuit Court for murder, kidnapping, and lst-degree robbery. In due course the trial judge entered an order requiring the Commonwealth to prosecute the case on an “open file” basis, pursuant to which the prosecuting attorney furnished to the appellants a list of 44 prospective witnesses he contemplated using at the trial. Thereafter the prosecuting attorney was replaced by two assistant attorneys-general, who proceeded to have the appellants indicted for murder and kidnapping in the…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Porter v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
- Hardy v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
- Lowe v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
- Robbins v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
- Commonwealth v. EckerleKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.