Byren & Weil, Inc. v. French & Keeley, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gawthrop, J.,
Appellant, the defendant, has assigned for error the dismissal of its motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and the entry of judgment against it on the findings of the trial judge, sitting without a jury.
The action was assumpsit. The statement of claim alleged (1) two written contracts, which are substantially alike in terms,- for the painting and display by plaintiff of an advertisement for defendant on the olio and on the street drop of the Palm Theatre in the City of Philadelphia, the material portion of which is as follows:
“Kindly place and display our…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stradley v. Bath Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Producers Coke Co. v. HillmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Lucesco Oil Co. v. BrewerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Buck v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Logan v. CaffreySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Exner v. ExnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Continental Supermarket Food Service, Inc. v. SoboskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Bushey v. DaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Whitt v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Keenan v. LarkinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.