Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brewer v. Rosenbaum

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1935No. 25288. En BancPublished

1DissentMitchell, J.

(dissenting) — I dissent. The purpose of the appeal is not to subject the interests of defendants in land to the payment of the mortgage which was of record at the time they became interested in the title to the land, but to make them pay the debt of another to a third person on account of an assumption clause in the deeds to them. Such a contract, even if oral, is valid and, if established according to the quantum of proof required, will be enforced.

From the date of the case of Ordway v. Downey, 18 Wash. 412, 51 Pac. 1047, 52 Pac. 228, 63 Am. St. 892, thirty-seven years ago, until the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Thompson v. DearbornIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. State ex rel. Winston v. MorrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Ordway v. DowneyWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Chaffee v. HawkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Blass v. . TerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1898

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API