Legal Opinion

Peters v. Thor

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1932No. Civil No. 3166PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, C. J.

Plaintiffs, Auguste Thor and Fred Thor, her husband, brought suit on a promissory note executed in favor of the former by Edna L. Peters and her husband, Amandus Peters. The trial resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in the amount asked for and from it and the order denying their motion for a new trial defendants appeal.

The note on which the suit is based reads as follows :

“$3660. Casa Grande, Arizona,
“December 15th, 1925.
“On or before three years after date, without grace, I, we, or either of us promise to pay to the order of Auguste Thor, at the First National Bank of Casa…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chaplin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API