(HC) Harris v. Butte County
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLARENCE HARRIS, No. 2:24-cv-1612 DAD CSK P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 BUTTE COUNTY, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 2241, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. 20 Examination of the affidavit reveals petitioner is unable to afford the costs of this action. 21 Accordingly, leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 22 As set forth…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Shawn Garfield Price v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Elbert W. Williamson v. Christine O. GregoireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.