Legal Opinion

State v. Workman

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 31, 1989Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REID, Judge.

This case presents an appeal as of right from conviction of selling more than 200 grams of a Schedule II controlled substance while in possession of a firearm.

Appellant asserts that the indictment was duplicitous, that he was convicted of two offenses on a one-count indictment.

The indictment charges:

That Bert Edward Workman heretofore, to wit, on the 11th day of March, 1980 ... did sell a certain controlled substance, to wit: Methaqualone in an amount in excess of 200 grams said drug being defined as a controlled substance in schedule II of section 52-1415 Tennessee Code…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HudsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Nease v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
  3. State v. ByerleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  4. State v. HicksCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  5. State v. ChambersTennessee Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API