Horak v. Argosy Gaming Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
This is an appeal of the jury’s verdict for the plaintiffs in an action brought under our state’s dram shop act, Iowa Code section 123.92 (1999). Because the dram shop at issue is a riverboat casino, the principal question on appeal is whether the district court erred when it refused to apply federal admiralty law instead of Iowa statutory law. We conclude that because there is no federal maritime dram shop law, federal preemption principles do not apply and the district court properly instructed the jury to consider the casino’s civil liability in accordance with section…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- American Dredging Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Yamaha Motor Corp., USA v. CalhounSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Rhonda BANWART, Appellant, v. 50TH STREET SPORTS, L.L.C. D/B/A Draught House 50, Appellee.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Smith v. Shagnasty's Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Jones v. LynnIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
- Horizon Homes of Davenport v. NunnSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Wilson v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.