Legal Opinion

Bush v. Territory of Hawaii

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Original.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINIQN OP THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J.

This is an action of ejectment to recover possession of certain parcels of land situated in the city of Honolulu — part of what was formerly known as the Charles Kanaina estate. The defend*2ant demurred generally, and the sole question necessary to determine is whether ejectment lies against the Territory.

It is conceded that the government may be sued only in so far as it consents, but it is contended that actions of ejectment may be maintained against it under Section 1 of the Act of March 16, 1895, (as now amen&ed by the Organic Act) which gives the Supreme…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Langford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. High v. Hawaiian GovernmentHawaii Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. W. H. Greenwell, Ltd. v. Department of Land & Natural ResourcesHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Meyer v. Territory of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Marks v. Ah NeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Land Title, KalenaHawaii Supreme Court · 1937
  5. In re McCandlessHawaii Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API