Legal Opinion
Ervin J. Robinson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 3, 1999No. 98-2055PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
In this successive appeal, Ervin Robinson argues that the district court erred in denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Robinson, who pleaded guilty, alleged numerous instances of deficient performance by counsel, but failed to prove he was prejudiced. Robinson also contends that in light of Rutledge v. United States, 517 U.S. 292, 116 S.Ct. 1241, 134 L.Ed.2d 419 (1996), his convictions and sentences for both conspiracy and for engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jose Evaristo Reyes-Requena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Brannon L. HatchettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Eugene A. FischerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Daniel O. LockettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.