Legal Opinion

Crimmins v. PennDot

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County

Decided February 13, 2003No. 96-S-1080Published

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE, J.,

This matter comes before the court on the plaintiffs’ motion to compel discovery. During depositions of representatives from the defendant, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), the plaintiffs1 attempted to inquire into a number of correspondences forwarded to or offered by PennDOT agents. PennDOT has objected to this inquiry on the claim that the correspondence is protected from discovery by the provisions of 75 Pa.C.S. §3754 (West 1996). A brief summary of the factual background of this matter will aid in disposition of this issue.

*366The plaintiffs’ complaint alleges…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API