Legal Opinion

Nelson Mantecon v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 29, 2005No. 05-11710; D.C. Docket 03-20882-CV-WMH, 90-00950-CR-WMHUnpublished

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Nelson Mantecon-Zayas, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, as an unauthorized second or successive § 2255 motion. Because Mantecón filed this appeal after the effective date of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”), Pub.L.No. 104-32, 110 Stat. 1214 (1996), it is governed by the AEDPA’s provisions. Mantecón argues on appeal that the district court erred in construing his § 2255 motion as an unauthorized second or successive § 2255…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Castro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Stewart v. Martinez-VillarealSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API