Legal Opinion

Vidal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 12, 1991No. 90-347PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Affirmed. See Tingley v. State, 549 So.2d 649 (Fla.1989); Mendyk v. State, 545 So.2d 846, 849-850 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 520, 107 L.Ed.2d 521 (1989); Buford v. State, 492 So.2d 355, 359 (Fla.1986); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986); Nunez v. State, 542 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Meadows v. State, 534 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Spivey v. State, 533 So.2d 306 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Beltran v. State, 530 So.2d 1045 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), approved, 566 So.2d 792 (Fla.1990); Lazarowicz v. State, 561 So.2d 392, 396-397 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Buford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Tingley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  4. Lazarowicz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. Mendyk v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Atlantic Asphalt & Equip. Co., Inc. v. MairenaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API