Legal Opinion

Jeanotte v. City of Rochester Police Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1082Petitioner contends further that the hearing board erred in denying his motion to dismiss the charges against him for failure to specify the dates of the alleged violations; that he was denied due process because the times specified for the occurrences were so indefinite that he was unable to defend against them. The essential function of charges in a disciplinary proceeding, like the function of an indictment in a criminal action, “is to provide the [accused] with sufficient information regarding the nature of the charge and the conduct which underlies the accusation to allow him or her to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Capone v. Patchogue-Medford Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Lloyd v. County of Suffolk Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API