Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

PPL Energyplus, LLC v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 10, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (together, PUC) have filed an application for summary relief (Application) in connection with two petitions for review, one filed by PPL Energyplus, LLC (PPL) and one filed by Delmarva Power & Light Company Va Conectiv Energy (Conectiv). We grant the Application.

In their respective petitions for review, PPL and Conectiv (together, Petitioners) challenge the PUC’s decision to assess Petitioners their share of the cost of administering “public utilities” under section 510 of the Public…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. James v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Dauphin Deposit Trust Co. v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Department of InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. PPL Energyplus, LLC v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Delmarva Power & Light Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Equitable Gas Co. v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API