Legal Opinion
Dent v. Packerland Packing Co.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided July 8, 1992No. 4:CV92-3175PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PIESTER, United States Magistrate Judge.
The United States, in behalf of certain employees of the United States Department of Agriculture, seeks to remove from the District Court of Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska proceedings initiated to compel the employees to provide depositional testimony. The parties were given leave to file evidence and submit written argument as to the whether this court has jurisdiction to *676remove the proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1), and if so, the merits of the employees’ position. For the reasons below, I conclude that the proceedings should…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mesa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Arizona v. ManypennySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Boron Oil Co. v. DownieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maddox v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- Dent v. Packerland Packing Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1992
- Hitchcock v. American Mortgage Company, a division of First StaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 2023
- Hitchcock v. American Mortgage Company, a division of First StaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 2023
- T.B., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Andrew Boyde v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ef al.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2026