Legal Opinion

Nolde's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1888No. Appeal, No. 75PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 75, Jan. T. 1888, from a decree of C. P. Lancaster Co., dismissing a bill in equity, by Lorenz Nolde, William Madlem and Jacob S. Spangler, against A. F. Madlem, Jos. J. R. Zerfass and Timothy Konigmacher, at June T. 1880, No. 2. Trunkey, J., absent.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 75, Jan. T. 1888, from a decree of C. P. Lancaster Co., dismissing a bill in equity, by Lorenz Nolde, William Madlem and Jacob S. Spangler, against A. F. Madlem, Jos. J. R. Zerfass and Timothy Konigmacher, at June T. 1880, No. 2. Trunkey, J., absent. The bill, filed June 2, 1880, averred, inter alia, that plaintiffs were duly elected and acting trustees of The Seventh Day Baptists of Ephrata; that defendants, by various acts, interfered with them in the proper discharge of their duties as such; that they threatened further interference, even unto bloodshed; that they molested and…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This case has'been so well disposed of by the learned j udge of the court below, that nothing remains for us to do but to affirm it on his opinion.

Appeal dismissed and decree affirmed at costs of appellants.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hope of Alabama Lodge of Odd Fellows v. ChamblessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Dayton v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Letham v. WatsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Tooks v. Hardy, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API