Legal Opinion

Miles v. Brusco Tug & Barge, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 30, 2022No. 2:18-cv-02860Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANK MILES, No. 2:18-cv-02860-TLN-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 BRUSCO TUG & BARGE, INC. and RONALD BRUSCO, JR., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Brusco Tug & Barge, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) 19 Motion to Compel Arbitration. (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff Frank Miles (“Plaintiff”) filed an 20 opposition. (ECF No. 17.) Defendant filed a reply. (ECF No. 20.) For the reasons set forth 21 below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 I.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API