Warren v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICE, Justice.
While the general law on the subject is none too clear (see 3 R. C. L., p. 719, Bastards; also 126 Am. St. Rep. 261, note), yet we are of the opinion that the following language of our Supreme Court, used in deciding the case of Bullock v. Knox, 96 Ala. 195, 11 So. 339, 340, is all that we need for our guidance in disposing of the instant appeal (Code 1923, § 7318), to wit:
“The ancient common-law authorities declared the issue of every married woman to be legitimate, except in the two special cases of the impoteney of the husband and his absence from the realm. * * * That rule…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bullock v. KnoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Lingen v. LingenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871
- Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leonard v. LeonardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Balfour v. BalfourCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Franks v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935
- Donahey v. DonaheyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Balance v. BalanceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.