Legal Opinion
Kirsten-Sanders Dental Laboratory, Inc. v. Sahli
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 8, 1965No. 16101PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered by the District Court dismissing the complaint which sought to set aside a denial by the District Director and the Regional Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization Service of Appellant’s petition filed pursuant to Section 203(a) (1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. § 1153(a) (1) to classify Albert Papazian as an alien whose services were needed urgently in the United States, and to enjoin the deportation of the alien. A temporary order restraining deportation was granted by the District Court, which was continued in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Constantinos Roumeliotis and Panayota Roumeliotis, His Wife v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
3Cited by4 opinions
- Isao Yamada, Mitsu Yamada, Katsumi Yamada and Three Star Products, Ltd. v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Tang v. District Director of the U. S. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1969
- Yee Chien Woo v. George K. Rosenberg, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Kirsten-Sanders Dental Laboratory, Inc. v. Walter A. SahliCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965