Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re T.A.S.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 19, 2011No. COA10-275Published

1DissentSteelman, Judge

*295Where TAS had a diminished privacy interest due to her attendance at an alternative school, the nature of the intrusion occasioned by the search in question was minimal, the governmental concern involved was important and immediate, and the search in question was an effective means of addressing that concern, the trial court did not err in denying TAS’ motion to suppress. I must respectfully dissent.

I. Additional Facts

Additional facts should be noted. Students were sent to Brunswick County Academy (“the Academy”) for violating the Brunswick County Code of Conduct, by engaging in violent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. EarlsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Koufman v. KoufmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API