Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 9, 1982No. 63325Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRendlen, Judge

The crimes of second degree robbery and armed criminal action,1 for which the defendant was charged and convicted, occurred on January 24, 1979. His second degree robbery conviction, § 569.030, RSMo 1978, resulted in a 15 year term of imprisonment, while under the armed criminal action conviction, § 571.015, RSMo 1978, he received a 75 year sentence.

I respectfully dissent in part and concur in part for the reasons expressed in my separate opinion in State v. Kane, 629 S.W.2d 370 (Mo.App.), decided concurrently herewith. I would affirm.. There is no issue regarding the kidnapping conviction…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. KaneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API