Legal Opinion

Ireland v. Globe Milling & Reduction Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided September 19, 1895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Assumpsit for refusing to transfer stock. On demurrers to the pleas and replications.

1Opinion of the CourtTillinghast, J.

The pleadings in this case present two questions for our decision, namely, first, is the stock of a non-resident, in a foreign corporation, doing business in this State, attachable here ; and, second, are the by-laws of the defendant corporation set up in its third special plea in bar, taken in connection with the statutes of the State of Maine relating to the transfer of stock in corporations, which are also pleaded, effectual to prevent William E. Stearns, the assignor of the stock in question, from transferring the same to the plaintiff by a mere indorsement and delivery thereof, so as to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Plimpton v. . BigelowNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Chafee v. Fourth National BankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1880
  3. Chouteau Spring Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
  4. Winslow v. FletcherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People's Home Savings Bank v. SadlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  2. Lawson v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1930
  3. Carpenter v. DummitCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Lawson v. Household Finance CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1930
  5. Atten v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API