Legal Opinion

Bell v. Eicholtz

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1949No. 10108PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riley, Judge:

Bertha Margaret Bell instituted this proceeding- in ha-beas corpus against respondents, Dean Eicholtz and Margaret Eicholtz, in the Circuit Court of Brooke County, to recover possession of her illegitimate child, Donna Marie Hader. The trial court, upon consideration of the pleadings and the record made, directed the entry of an order to the effect that the respondents do deliver up possession, custody and control of said infant to the petitioner, as well as pay costs of the proceeding. To the foregoing judgment the respondents prosecute the present writ of error and supersedeas.

I…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Lipscomb v. JoplinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Green v. CampbellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Cunningham v. BarnesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Pukas v. PukasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Whiteman v. RobinsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State Ex Rel. Harmon v. UtterbackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Stout v. MassieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. In Re Sutton, Inf.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Hammond v. Department of Public AssistanceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API