Estate of Christensen
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A. V. Scanlan, James H. Budd, and C. H. Fairall, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
The above plaintiffs, having instituted proceedings under section 1664 of the Code of Civil Procedure to have the rights of all claimants to the estate of Peter Christensen, deceased, adjudicated, and all preliminary steps having been properly taken, on June 3,1899, filed their complaint, in which they averred that said decedent died intestate, and that they (setting up the facts constituting their claims) were entitled, as heirs, to all his estate. A number of persons were brought in and made defendants, as claiming some interest in the estate. The defendant Norton was administrator, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Castro v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- McDaniel v. PattisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Mahe v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by9 opinions
- Reed v. HaywardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Simonton v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- In Re the Estate of WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Estate of ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Burnett v. BurnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.