Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board v. Lecuyer
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
The Department of Jobs and Training determined that respondent Leo LeCuyer was entitled to receive unemployment benefits for periods when he was not working but was receiving compensation previously earned and set aside by his employer in a special account. We reverse.
FACTS
Respondent Leo LeCuyer was employed as a mobile equipment operator for relator Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board (“Park Board”). LeCuyer was a full-time permanent intermittment worker, “on call” to do work when it was available.
The terms of a collective bargaining agreement between LeCuyer’s union…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- In Re Adoption of AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- McGowan v. Executive Express Transportation Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Stearns-Hotzfield v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Novitsky v. Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.