Legal Opinion

Holland v. Kitterman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 4, 1971No. 1 CA-CIV 963Published

1Opinion of the Court

HAIRE, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellants Holland (homeowners) and Hartford Fire Insurance Company (homeowners fire insurer) 1 have appealed from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for the defendant painting contractor (Ferland) and her employee (Kitterman). The primary contention raised concerns the trial court’s failure to give the jury a res ipsa loquitur instruction requested by plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs alleged in their complaint both specific acts of claimed negligent conduct and facts and circumstances which indicated an intent to rely upon the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. We have reviewed the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Throop v. FE Young and CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Yoo Thun Lim v. CrespinArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Orlando v. NorthcuttArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Valley National Bank v. WitterArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Capps v. American Airlines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API