Legal Opinion

Arpod J. Artwohl v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 11, 1970No. 151-66Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NICHOLS, Judge.

Plaintiffs herein claim just compensation under the Fifth Amendment for an alleged taking of their property by the United States. The property allegedly taken is the “excess profits” from the duty-free sale of private automobiles in Brazil by the plaintiffs pursuant to a diplomatic privilege. The commissioner found for the plaintiffs. We reverse. *

Plaintiffs are members of the U.S. Armed Forces who at the time of the transactions here involved were assigned to the Joint Brazil-United States Military Commission, (JBUSMC) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Coincident with this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fruhauf Southwest Garment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  2. Dominic Eyherabide, Jean M. Eyherabide, Raymond Castanchoa and Marie Castanchoa v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. Urban Plumbing & Heating Co., an Oregon Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  4. Aircraft Associates & Mfg. Co., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  5. Inland Empire Builders, Inc., J. C. Boespflug Construction Co., and McLaughlin Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API