Legal Opinion

Fischel v. Fischel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 22, 1907Published

Appeal by the defendant, Rebecca Jacobs, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 11th day of October, 1907, .denying the said, defendant’s application for a further bill, of particulars.

1Opinion of the Court

Scott, J.:

It appears from the papers before us that the action is one to compel specific performance by the appellant of an agreement to convey certain property to her codefendant and the plaintiff. A former motion for a bill of particulars was granted and in response to if the plaintiff set forth that the defendant Harry Fischel had agreed with plaintiff that the latter' would sell to the said Harry Fischel 125 shares in the Grand Theatre Company; that said Harry Fischel would endeavor to purchase a certain plot of land in the city of New York for the sum of $355,000 to be j>aid as follows:…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rhodes v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API