Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Utsey

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 17, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Final judgment unanimously reversed without costs, petitioner’s motion for summary judgment denied and summary judgment granted in favor of occupants dismissing the petition.

The issue in this squatter proceeding is whether occupants are tenants at will or at sufferance and thus entitled to a 30-day notice pursuant to Real Property Law § 228. We hold that under the circumstances of this case occupants are tenants at will and that the City’s failure to serve the required 30-day notice upon them mandates dismissal of the petition.

The City commenced this squatter…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kerrains v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Manhattan School of Music v. SolowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Harris v. . FrinkNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Livingston v. . TannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  5. Wilson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 11114 101 Ave Corp. v. Ramlogan, Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Queens County2025
  2. 167 North Ninth Street Corp. v. HelfandCivil Court of the City of New York · 2011
  3. Abacus Clinton LLC v. RamosAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API