Legal Opinion
Gunsberg v. Roseland Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohn F. Scileppi, J.
In this action for slander, the defendant moves pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the second cause of action on the ground that it appears on the face of the complaint that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The plaintiff alleges that at the time of the occurrence complained of he was a duly registered member of the New York State Stock Exchange and a duly registered broker for the purpose of effectuating for the general public the sale and purchase of securities traded upon the said exchange, and was employed as a customer’s man.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. . FrancisNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Sanderson v. . CaldwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Kinney v. . NashNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Purdy v. . the Rochester Printing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Martin v. WagnerNew York Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by2 opinions
- Modla v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Sadowy v. Sony Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980