Legal Opinion
Blazek v. Capital Recovery Associates, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 15, 2004No. 03-C-520PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ADELMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this suit under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., as a putative class action. Defendant did not answer or otherwise appear, and the clerk entered defendant’s default.1 Plaintiff now wishes to take discovery of defendant in order to determine the composition of the class and the amount of damages. She states that this information is necessary to enable her to obtain a default judgment. See Davis v. Hutchins, 321 F.3d 641, 648-49 (7th Cir.2003) (holding that district court must determine…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sidney Davis, III v. Charles T. HutchinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Qwest Communications International, Inc. v. WorldQuest Networks, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2003
- Lu v. Liu (In Re Liu)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2002
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jules Jordan Video, Inc. v. 144942 Canada Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Tristrata Technology, Inc. v. Medical Skin Therapy Research, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- United States v. 2121 Celeste Road SWDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Success Village Apartments, Inc. v. Amalgamated Local 376District Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Brown v. TennisonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.