Legal Opinion
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Heyden (In re Heyden)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 1, 2017No. Case No. 15-22435-TPAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Thomas P. Agresti, Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court
Presently before the Court for consideration is a Motion to Allow Late Proof of Claim (“Motion”) filed by secured creditor Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“WF”) at Doc. No. 63. The Motion has been briefed and argued. The Court has the jurisdiction to hear and decide this core matter. See, 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(B) and 138),. For the reasons explained below, the Motion will be denied.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This is a Chapter 13 case that was filed on July 5, 2015. On July 30, 2015, the Debtor completed her petition and filed a plan.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re O'brien Environmental Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- In re PajianCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- In Re TownsvilleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- In re EganUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chi. Title Ins. Co. v. Mazik (In re Mazik)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- In re Cubic Energy, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2018
- Crawford v. 2827 California Inc. (In re Tam of Allegheny LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Wallen v. Tauren Exploration, Inc. (In re Cubic Energy, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2019