Legal Opinion

Goldome Credit Corp. v. Burke

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 2, 2005No. 1021072PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant below, Goldome Credit Corporation, appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Selena Burke, the plaintiff/class representative in this class action alleging that Goldome imposed excessive charges on mortgage loans. We reverse and remand.

Facts and Procedural History

On August 24, 1988, Selena Burke and her daughter, Diane Burke,2 executed a simple-interest note ("the note") in the amount of $14,101, payable to Horizon Funding, Inc. The note was secured by a mortgage on property owned by Selena. The note bore interest at a yearly rate of 15.5% and was payable in monthly…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Ex Parte GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. Nationwide Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. DPF ARCHITECTSSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. American Liberty Insurance Co. v. Amsouth BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. Ex Parte State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Unocal Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. M.C. v. Tallassee Rehabilitation, P.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2015
  3. Cline v. Ashland, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  5. In re: B.F. v. C.D. and A.D.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API