Goldome Credit Corp. v. Burke
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant below, Goldome Credit Corporation, appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Selena Burke, the plaintiff/class representative in this class action alleging that Goldome imposed excessive charges on mortgage loans. We reverse and remand.
Facts and Procedural History
On August 24, 1988, Selena Burke and her daughter, Diane Burke,2 executed a simple-interest note ("the note") in the amount of $14,101, payable to Horizon Funding, Inc. The note was secured by a mortgage on property owned by Selena. The note bore interest at a yearly rate of 15.5% and was payable in monthly…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Ex Parte GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Nationwide Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. DPF ARCHITECTSSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- American Liberty Insurance Co. v. Amsouth BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Ex Parte State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Griffin v. Unocal Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- M.C. v. Tallassee Rehabilitation, P.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2015
- Cline v. Ashland, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
- In re: B.F. v. C.D. and A.D.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2026