Legal Opinion

Naylor v. Naylor

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 24, 1985No. 84-243PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*399ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

LETTS, Judge.

We grant the motion for clarification. The original opinion is withdrawn and we substitute the following:

The issue meriting discussion is whether the trial court erred in its two orders by failing to comply with the requirements set forth in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840.

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840 governs indirect criminal contempt. The procedural due process safeguards set forth therein were not complied with here. No order to show cause was issued, nor was appellant apprised of the essential facts constituting the alleged…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pugliese v. PuglieseSupreme Court of Florida · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fay v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Acevedo v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API