Naylor v. Naylor
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
*399ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
LETTS, Judge.
We grant the motion for clarification. The original opinion is withdrawn and we substitute the following:
The issue meriting discussion is whether the trial court erred in its two orders by failing to comply with the requirements set forth in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840.
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840 governs indirect criminal contempt. The procedural due process safeguards set forth therein were not complied with here. No order to show cause was issued, nor was appellant apprised of the essential facts constituting the alleged…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pugliese v. PuglieseSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fay v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Acevedo v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996