Legal Opinion

Todd v. S. A. Healy Co.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided April 8, 1943No. 182PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FORD, District Judge.

Plaintiff’s motion to remand this suit to the Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Kentucky, from which it was removed, presents for determination the questions, (1) whether the petition for removal was timely filed, and (2) whether, by filing in the state court a motion to quash the service of the summons which was there sustained, the defendant waived its right to subsequently remove the cause to this court after valid service of summons.

Section 29 of the Judicial Code of the United States, 28 U.S.C.A. § 72, requires that a petition for removal be filed “at the time, or any…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Remington v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marks v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API