Legal Opinion
Clinkscale v. United States
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided January 28, 2005No. 4:03 CV 416PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S 28 U.S.C. § 2255 MOTION
WELLS, District Judge.
Before this Court is pro se petitioner Jantz S. Clinkscale’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Docket # 1). In connection with his petition, Mr. Clinkscale also filed a motion for discovery of grand jury minutes. (Docket # 7). Respondent filed an answer to Mr. Clinkscale’s petition and a response in opposition to his motion for discovery of grand jury minutes. (Docket # 8). Mr. Clinkscale then filed a traverse. (Docket # 9).
After briefing…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. CanodyColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Gomez v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023