Time Warner Operations, Inc. v. Wilkins
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
*560{¶ 1} The issue in these cases is whether Time Warner should have collected sales tax on rental fees it charged customers for converter boxes. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that Time Warner should have collected sales tax for the rental of the converter boxes.
{¶ 2} In these two consolidated cases, Time Warner Operations, Inc. and Time Warner Entertainment (collectively, “Time Warner”) challenge the Tax Commissioner’s finding that they owed sales tax on the rental fees they collected from their customers for the use of Time Warner’s converter boxes for the period July 1, 1992,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- American National Can Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Standards Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Manfredi Motor Transit Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Ohio Edison Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.