Legal Opinion
Conoco, Inc. v. Skinner
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 16, 1991No. Civ. A. 91-122-JLLPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (“Du Pont”) and its wholly owned subsidiary Conoco, Inc. (“Conoco”), seek judicial review in this Court of federal agency action concerning documentation, ownership, and chartering of vessels in coastwise trade under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”). 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. (1977 & Supp.1991) (Docket Item [“D.I.”] 1,13.) Defendants, the Secretaries of the United States Departments of Transportation and Treasury, the Commandant of the United States Coast Guard, the Commissioner of the United…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Conoco, Inc. v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Canada Life Assurance Co. v. Converium Rückerversicherung (Deutschland) AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Authority of OPM to Direct Health Insurer Not to Enroll Individual Deemed Eligible by Employing Agency, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2010
- Conoco, Inc. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co., in No. 91-3589 v. Samuel K. Skinner, Secretary of Transportation Warren G. Leback, Maritime Administrator and the United States of America. Conoco, Inc. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co., in No. 91-3920 v. Samuel K. Skinner, Secretary of Transportation Nicholas F. Brady William A. Kime, Commandant of the Coast Guard Warren G. Leback, Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation Carol B. Hallett, Commissioner of Customs, U.S. Customs ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992