Legal Opinion

BEHRENS v. ARCONIC, INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02664Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KRISTEN BEHRENS, ESQ., as CIVIL ACTION Administratrix, et al. NO. 19-2664 v. ARCONIC, INC., et al. MEMORANDUM RE FRENCH BLOCKING STATUTE DISCOVERY DISPUTE Baylson, J. March 13, 2020 I. Introduction This action arises out of the Grenfell Tower fire that occurred in England in 2017. The parties are currently engaged in limited discovery on Defendants’ pending Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens (“FNC” or the “FNC Motion”). A major discovery issue that has arisen in this FNC discovery is whether the French…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. In Re: Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust Litigation Basf Ag and Basf Coatings AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  4. Animal Science Products, Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. Minpeco, S.A. v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API