Legal Opinion
Schollian v. Ullo
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 14, 1990No. 89-CA-667PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KLIEBERT, Judge.
Mr. and Mrs. William Schollian, plaintiffs-appellants, perfected this appeal from a trial court ruling easting them in judgment on defendants’, William Ullo and Star Light Construction Company’s, reconven-tional demand for breach of a contract to buy and sell real estate. The defendants neither appealed nor answered the appeal, but in brief their counsel requested additional attorney fees for defending the appeal. The trial court ruling dated January 3, 1989 cast the buyers in judgment for $10,900.00, legal interest, court costs, and attorney fees of $5,000.00. For the reasons…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Arrow Fence Co. v. DeFranceschLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Groghan v. BillingsleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rivnor Properties v. Herbert O'Donnell, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- Nesbitt v. DunnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Fontenot v. Flaire, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- Burgess v. ZhengLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Walsworth v. Chesapeake Louisiana, L.P.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.