Legal Opinion

The "Connemara."

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 10, 1881PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Motion to dismiss an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana, united with a motion to affirm the decree.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite

The suit below was by a set of salvors to recover for a single salvage service, and there was but one claim filed for the prop erty saved. The total amount of the recovery was $14,198, but in the division among the several parties entitled to share in the recovery some got less than $5,000. Separate and distinct interests were not united in the suit. The service rendered was the joint service of all the salvors, and the recovery was on that account. It was a inatter of no consequence to the owners of the property saved how the money recovered was apportioned among those who had earned it. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oliver v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Shields v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  3. Rich v. LambertSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  4. Seaver v. BigelowsSupreme Court of the United States · 1867

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gibson v. ShufeldtSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Clay v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Illinois Central Railroad Company, Appt. v. Wirt AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Robert E. Hedberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  5. New Orleans Pacific Railway Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API