Legal Opinion

Westheimer v. Musliner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Moses Musliner and others, from an ■order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term, and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York ■on. the 5th day of June, 189-9, denying their motion to compel the plaintiffs to separately number and state the causes of action alleged :in the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

McLaughlin, J. :

This action is brought to recover possession of personal property alleged to have been wrongfully obtained from the plaintiffs and their assignors.

The complaint alleges that the firm of Colucci & Graniori, being insolvent and not intending to pay therefor, obtained from the plaintiffs certain personal property, which it wrongfully and fraudulently transferred to one Joseph Meyer, by whom the same was transferred to the defendants; that the transfer to Colucci & Graniori to Meyer, and by Meyer to the defendants, was made ■without consideration and with intent to hinder, delay…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huguley v. GardnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. Whitney v. WenmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. E. Sonnenschein & Co. v. Roberts Companies of America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API