Legal Opinion
Palmer v. Central Life Assurance Society of United States
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 18, 1935No. 30,216PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Justice.
In a suit brought by the beneficiary of, and the assignee of a part interest in, a life insurance policy, the plaintiffs had a directed verdict, and the case comes here upon appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
May 15, 1918, David A. Palmer insured his life for $5,000 with the defendant. The policy was a 20-payment life contract. The annual premium was $188.55, and this was paid until and including the premium due on May 15, 1928. Prior to that time Palmer had secured a loan on this policy from the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Board of Assessors of the Parish v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Rosenthal v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Mills v. National Life InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
- Palmer v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Great Horizons Development Corp. v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1978
- Erickson v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Davis v. Mutual Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938
- Rick v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936
- Columbus Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. HinesOhio Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.