Edwards v. Dorsey
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Forfeiture of recognizance; from Floyd superior court — Judge Wright. July 2, 1921.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
While it is not necessary that the offense named in a recognizance be stated with the same degree of particularity as is required in an indictment, or that it be set out specifically or in detail, “ the offense described in the recognizance must be one punishable by law; ” and where it is not, the recognizance is void. The recognizance in the instant case is conditioned for the appearance of the principal to answer to a special presentment of the grand jury for “the offense of shooting,” and having failed to set out specifically or in substance an “ offense committed against the laws of this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Nicholson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
- Vaughan v. CandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hardwick v. ShahanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Holcomb v. VandiverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Hankerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977