Anonymous v. Anonymous
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*297The Supreme Court appropriately exercised its discretion in declining to grant plaintiffs request to exclude all persons except the parties, their counsel and witnesses from the hearing in the instant custody dispute. Public access to court proceedings is strongly favored, both as a matter of constitutional law (Richmond Newspapers v Virginia, 448 US 555) and as statutory imperative (Judiciary Law §4). In that regard, plaintiff has not established sufficient grounds to warrant closing the court in the present instance. The unsupported speculation by her counsel as to the deleterious effect…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bingham v. StruveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- PB-7 Doe v. Amherst Cent. Sch. Dist.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Anonymous v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Merrick v. MerrickNew York Supreme Court · 1992
- Anonymous v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.