Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Heert

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided November 15, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by George W. Perkins against Henry H. Heert and others. Plaintiff moves for an extra allowance.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

This is a motion for an extra allowance under section 3253 of the Code, on the ground that the case was a difficult and extraordinary one. The action was to restrain defendants from using a certain trade-mark, and for an accounting and the payment of profits arising from defendants’ use of such trade-mark. The trial resulted in plaintiff’s favor, and judgment was rendered restraining defendants from using such trade-mark, and granting an accounting. The referee appointed to take such accounting found *435the sum due from defendants to be $75. The plaintiff claims an extra allowance, based, not on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Munro v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Sheldon v. AllertonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1849

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Town of Brighton v. Seminole Paving Co., Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API